lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140210092500.GB7864@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:25:00 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@...il.com>,
	Chris Mason <clm@...com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [btrfs] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
 0000000000000038

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 03:10:37PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, David, Fengguang, Chris.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:13:06PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > [    1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
> > > > > [    1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests
> > > > > [    2.289182] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2299.967 MHz
> > > > > [  292.084537] kthreadd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x3000d0, order=1, oom_score_adj=0
> > > > > [  292.086439] kthreadd cpuset=
> > > > > [  292.087072] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038
> > > > > [  292.087372] IP: [<ffffffff812119de>] pr_cont_kernfs_name+0x1b/0x6c
> > > > 
> > > > This looks like a problem with the cpuset cgroup name, are you sure this 
> > > > isn't related to the removal of cgroup->name?
> > > 
> > > It looks not related to patch "cgroup: remove cgroup->name", because
> > > that patch lies in the cgroup tree and not contained in output of "git log BAD_COMMIT".

Sorry I was wrong here. I find that the above dmesg is for commit
4830363 which is a merge HEAD that contains the cgroup code.

The dmesg for commit 878a876b2e1 ("Merge branch 'for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs")
looks different, which hangs after the tsc line:

[    2.428110] Btrfs loaded, assert=on, integrity-checker=on
[    2.429469] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs free space cache tests
[    2.430874] BTRFS: selftest: Running extent only tests
[    2.432135] BTRFS: selftest: Running bitmap only tests
[    2.433359] BTRFS: selftest: Running bitmap and extent tests
[    2.434675] BTRFS: selftest: Free space cache tests finished
[    2.435959] BTRFS: selftest: Running extent buffer operation tests
[    2.437350] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
[    2.438843] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests
[    3.158351] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2666.596 MHz


> > It's dying on pr_cont_kernfs_name which is some tree that has "kernfs: 
> > implement kernfs_get_parent(), kernfs_name/path() and friends", which is 
> > not in linux-next, and is obviously printing the cpuset cgroup name.
> > 
> > It doesn't look like it has anything at all to do with btrfs or why they 
> > would care about this failure.
> 
> Yeah, this is from a patch in cgroup/review-post-kernfs-conversion
> branch which updates cgroup to use pr_cont_kernfs_name().  I forget
> that cgrp->kn is NULL for the dummy_root's top cgroup and thus it ends
> up calling the kernfs functions with NULL kn and thus the oops.  I
> posted an updated patch and the git branch has been updated.
> 
>  http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20140208200640.GB10975@htj.dyndns.org
> 
> So, nothing to do with btrfs and it looks like somehow the test
> appratus is mixing up branches?

Yes - I may do random merges and boot test the resulted kernels.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ