lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140210092710.GA10899@elgon.mountain>
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:27:10 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: WARNING: Unnecessary parentheses - maybe == should be = ?

These messages are terrifying...  We do not want to encourage a million
first patch submitters to start introducing = vs == bugs.

Did you look through the warning messages this generates?  Was it ever
appropriate to change the == to =?

Please remove the second part of that message.

Also there needs to be a mailing list for checkpatch.pl.  LKML is a
write only archive, but it's not a discussion list.

Also the seq_puts() warning messages should be put under --strict
because we have to fight against people submitting those patches.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ