[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140210102935.GC25305@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:29:35 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Steven Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@...com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mm: report both sections from PMD
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:18:26PM +0000, Kees Cook wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dump.c b/arch/arm/mm/dump.c
> index 1f7b1e13d945..ff1559f9200c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dump.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dump.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ static void walk_pmd(struct pg_state *st, pud_t *pud, unsigned long start)
> note_page(st, addr, 3, pmd_val(*pmd));
> else
> walk_pte(st, pmd, addr);
> +
> + if (SECTION_SIZE < PMD_SIZE && pmd_sect(*pmd))
> + note_page(st, addr + SECTION_SIZE, 3, pmd_val(pmd[1]));
You can use pmd_large() here as well.
But I think this function is broken (the "for" statement not shown
here). The pmd_t is 32-bit with classic MMU and it uses pmd++ while the
address grows by PMD_SIZE (two pmd_t entries).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists