[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140210115109.GC22773@lee--X1>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:51:09 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ASoC: da9055: Fix device registration of PMIC and
CODEC devices
> > > +/*
> > > + * DO NOT change the device Ids. The naming is intentionally specific as both
> > > + * the PMIC and CODEC parts of this chip are instantiated separately as I2C
> > > + * devices (both have configurable I2C addresses, and are to all intents and
> > > + * purposes separate). As a result there are specific DA9055 ids for PMIC
> > > + * and CODEC, which must be different to operate together.
> > > + */
>
> > I'm not sure this comment is required.
>
> They are, we've already had the suffixes removed from both PMIC and
> CODEC drivers by people doing code review causing the drivers to fail to
> load for several kernel releases (this should be tagged to stable as a
> result).
>
> > Most device IDs are named this way.
>
> Having the suffix on a subdevice would be normal but it's not normal for
> the primary I2C device, usually you can just put the part number in.
Okay, no problem then. Ignore my last.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists