[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F8D46E.7030704@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:00:22 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, paulus@...ba.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, walken@...gle.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/51] CPU hotplug: Provide lockless versions of callback
registration functions
On 02/10/2014 04:21 PM, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:45:55PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> Hi Gautham,
>>
>> On 02/08/2014 12:41 AM, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 07:41:03PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>> On 02/06, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The following method of CPU hotplug callback registration is not safe
>>>>> due to the possibility of an ABBA deadlock involving the cpu_add_remove_lock
>>>>> and the cpu_hotplug.lock.
>>>>
[...]
>> This patch looks good to me. I have a couple of suggestions though..
>>
>
> Thanks. I have incorporated the suggestions. Could you check if the
> following looks good ?
>
> ---
> Add lockdep annotations for get/put_online_cpus() and
> cpu_hotplug_begin()/cpu_hotplug_end().
>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index deff2e6..33caf5e 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/suspend.h>
> +#include <linux/lockdep.h>
>
> #include "smpboot.h"
>
> @@ -57,17 +58,30 @@ static struct {
> * an ongoing cpu hotplug operation.
> */
> int refcount;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> + struct lockdep_map dep_map;
> +#endif
> } cpu_hotplug = {
> .active_writer = NULL,
> .lock = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(cpu_hotplug.lock),
> .refcount = 0,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> + .dep_map = {.name = "cpu_hotplug.lock" },
> +#endif
> };
>
> +/* Lockdep annotations for get/put_online_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_begin/end() */
> +#define cpuhp_lock_acquire_read() lock_map_acquire_read(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
> +#define cpuhp_lock_acquire() lock_map_acquire(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
> +#define cpuhp_lock_release() lock_map_release(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
> +
> void get_online_cpus(void)
> {
> might_sleep();
> if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
> return;
> + cpuhp_lock_acquire_read();
> mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> cpu_hotplug.refcount++;
> mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> @@ -87,6 +101,7 @@ void put_online_cpus(void)
> if (!--cpu_hotplug.refcount && unlikely(cpu_hotplug.active_writer))
> wake_up_process(cpu_hotplug.active_writer);
> mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> + cpuhp_lock_release();
>
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(put_online_cpus);
> @@ -117,6 +132,7 @@ void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)
> {
> cpu_hotplug.active_writer = current;
>
> + cpuhp_lock_acquire();
> for (;;) {
> mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> if (likely(!cpu_hotplug.refcount))
> @@ -131,6 +147,7 @@ void cpu_hotplug_done(void)
> {
> cpu_hotplug.active_writer = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
> + cpuhp_lock_release();
> }
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists