linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Add CPU model 54 (Atom N2000 series)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:07:19 +0000
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_idle: Add CPU model 54 (Atom N2000 series)

On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:24:22 +0100
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de> wrote:

> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> 
> Add CPU ID for Atom N2600/N2800 processors. Datasheets indicate support
> for this, detailed information about potential quirks or limitations are
> missing, though. So we just reuse the definition for the previous ATOM
> series. Tests on N2800 systems showed that this addition is fine an can
> reduce power consumption by about 0.25 W (personally confirmed on Intel
> DN2800MT).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>

Len - what's going on with this, and with the other identical patches
people have posted ? This still doesn't seem to be in -next which leaves
the various Cedartrail platforms still not covered by intel_idle.
Likewise the same with Oaktrail, despite patches being submitted several
times over the past two years ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/