linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [media] v4l: omap4iss: Remove VIDEO_OMAP4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1409428.L7JLLEda5C@avalon>
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:29:31 +0100
From:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] v4l: omap4iss: Remove VIDEO_OMAP4_DEBUG

Hi Paul,

On Monday 10 February 2014 16:13:51 Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:13 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 February 2014 16:09:37 Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > Commit d632dfefd36f ("[media] v4l: omap4iss: Add support for OMAP4
> > > camera interface - Build system") added a Kconfig entry for
> > > VIDEO_OMAP4_DEBUG. But nothing uses that symbol.
> > > 
> > > This entry was apparently copied from a similar entry for "OMAP 3
> > > Camera debug messages". But a corresponding Makefile line is missing.
> > > Besides, the debug code also depends on a mysterious ISS_ISR_DEBUG
> > > macro. This Kconfig entry can be removed.
> > 
> > What about adding the associated Makefile line instead to #define DEBUG
> > when VIDEO_OMAP4_DEBUG is selected, as with the OMAP3 ISP driver ?
> > 
> > > Someone familiar with the code might be able to say what to do with the
> > > code depending on the DEBUG and ISS_ISR_DEBUG macros.
> > 
> > ISS_ISR_DEBUG is expected to be set by manually modifying the source code,
> > as it prints lots of messages in interrupt context.
> 
> Which renders the DEBUG macro pointless. Or does the code use some
> dev_dbg()-like magic, which is only triggered if the DEBUG macro is set?

Yes, dev_dbg() is used.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/