[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140210153653.GA20017@opentech.at>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:36:53 +0100
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
To: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andreas Platschek <platschek@....tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [PATCH RT 0/5] preempt_disable/enable -> migrate_disable/enable
pushdown proposals
a small series of preempt_disable/enable -> migrate_disable/enable pushdown
proposals
In mainline a number of preempt_disable/enable are actually topology control
and not actual concurrency control - these cases can be pushed down to a
preemptible migrate_disable/enable.
This little series contains a few pushdowns from preempt_disable to
migrate_disable where code pattern scans using cocci scripts suggested this
to be possible. The cases detected were then reviewed and tested with the
migrate_disable/enable respectively with the preempt_disable/enable
completely removed in one case.
Testing was done but is of very limited use for locking/migration related
issues, so a review of the code analysis/rational is requested along with
additional testing.
thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists