[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140210172751.GA30766@balbir-System-Product-Name>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:57:51 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, paulus@...ba.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, walken@...gle.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/51] CPU hotplug: Provide lockless versions of callback
registration functions
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:21:30PM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:45:55PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>
> + cpuhp_lock_acquire_read();
> mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
Don't you want to abstract cpuhp_lock_acquire_read and mutex_lock into a
more useful primitive. Ditto for the unlock bits - specifically if they
will always be used together.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists