[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6429e1bb-d4ad-4bf2-bd75-456324f45629@CO9EHSMHS016.ehs.local>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:46:07 -0800
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] clocksource/cadence_ttc: Use only one counter
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 09:41:53PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > Currently the driver uses two of the three counters the TTC provides to
> > implement a clocksource and a clockevent device. By using the TTC's
> > match feature we can implement both use cases using a single counter
> > only.
>
> Are you entirely sure that this match feature is free of the infamous
> HPET match feature issues?
>
> See arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c: hpet_next_event()
>
> If yes, please add a comment. If no ....
Good catch. Looks like the comparator compares on == as well. So, I
assume it may show similar issues. I'll have to spend some more time
looking into this.
Thanks for applying the first two patches of the series.
Thanks,
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists