lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW3FS5aOmfp7X70RuXgCO-XfXHZ2G8sEpyOKV=pn1EzCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:05:58 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] audit: Turn off TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT when there are no rules

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Monday, February 10, 2014 09:29:19 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Grr.  Why is all this crap tied up with syscall auditing anyway?  ISTM
>> it would have been a lot nicer if audit calls just immediately emitted
>> audit records, completely independently of the syscall machinery.
>
> Because the majority of people needing audit need syscall records for it to
> make any sense. The auxiliary records generally report on the object of the
> syscall. We still require information about who was doing something, what they
> were doing, and what the result was.
>
> Even if you just get the AVC's, you still don't know what happened. If you get
> a deny record, was it really denied? The system could have been in permissive
> mode and the syscall succeeded. You only get the real decision when you have
> syscall records.
>

Fair enough.

I'll see if I can turn this into something more workable.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ