[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F914A7.9080702@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:34:23 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: paulus@...ba.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, walken@...gle.com,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/51] x86, therm_throt.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
On 02/10/2014 10:59 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 09:23 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 02/06, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
>>> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
>>> if (!atomic_read(&therm_throt_en))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> - register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
>>> + cpu_maps_update_begin();
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>> mutex_lock(&therm_cpu_lock);
>>> @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ static __init int thermal_throttle_init_device(void)
>>> mutex_unlock(&therm_cpu_lock);
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> + __register_hotcpu_notifier(&thermal_throttle_cpu_notifier);
>>> + cpu_maps_update_done();
>>
>>
>> Off-topic, but it seems that after this change therm_cpu_lock can die.
>> Of course this needs another patch (if I am right).
>>
>
> I'm not sure I understood that clearly. Can you please explain?
>
> I'm guessing that you are referring to some problem with the #ifdef
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU around mutex_lock/unlock(&therm_cpu_lock) ?
>
Oh, nevermind, now I see it. Basically you are suggesting that therm_cpu_lock
is useless after this patch and hence can be removed entirely. Yep, that
makes sense. (I hadn't noticed it earlier). I'll incorporate that change
in a separate patch in my v2 of the patchset. Thank you!
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists