linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.8 120/124] net: Fix memory leak if TPROXY used with TCP early demux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1392061264-28124-121-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:41:00 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...zenberger.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.8 120/124] net: Fix memory leak if TPROXY used with TCP early demux

3.8.13.18 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...zenberger.org>

[ Upstream commit a452ce345d63ddf92cd101e4196569f8718ad319 ]

I see a memory leak when using a transparent HTTP proxy using TPROXY
together with TCP early demux and Kernel v3.8.13.15 (Ubuntu stable):

unreferenced object 0xffff88008cba4a40 (size 1696):
  comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294944115 (age 8907.520s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    0a e0 20 6a 40 04 1b 37 92 be 32 e2 e8 b4 00 00  .. j@.....2.....
    02 00 07 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff810b710a>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xad/0xb9
    [<ffffffff81270185>] sk_prot_alloc+0x29/0xc5
    [<ffffffff812702cf>] sk_clone_lock+0x14/0x283
    [<ffffffff812aaf3a>] inet_csk_clone_lock+0xf/0x7b
    [<ffffffff8129a893>] netlink_broadcast+0x14/0x16
    [<ffffffff812c1573>] tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1b/0x4c3
    [<ffffffff812c033e>] tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x38/0x25d
    [<ffffffff812c13e4>] tcp_check_req+0x25c/0x3d0
    [<ffffffff812bf87a>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x287/0x40e
    [<ffffffff812a08a7>] ip_route_input_noref+0x843/0xa55
    [<ffffffff812bfeca>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x4c9/0x725
    [<ffffffff812a26f4>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xe9/0x154
    [<ffffffff8127a927>] __netif_receive_skb+0x4b2/0x514
    [<ffffffff8127aa77>] process_backlog+0xee/0x1c5
    [<ffffffff8127c949>] net_rx_action+0xa7/0x200
    [<ffffffff81209d86>] add_interrupt_randomness+0x39/0x157

But there are many more, resulting in the machine going OOM after some
days.

>From looking at the TPROXY code, and with help from Florian, I see
that the memory leak is introduced in tcp_v4_early_demux():

  void tcp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb)
  {
    /* ... */

    iph = ip_hdr(skb);
    th = tcp_hdr(skb);

    if (th->doff < sizeof(struct tcphdr) / 4)
        return;

    sk = __inet_lookup_established(dev_net(skb->dev), &tcp_hashinfo,
                       iph->saddr, th->source,
                       iph->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
                       skb->skb_iif);
    if (sk) {
        skb->sk = sk;

where the socket is assigned unconditionally to skb->sk, also bumping
the refcnt on it.  This is problematic, because in our case the skb
has already a socket assigned in the TPROXY target.  This then results
in the leak I see.

The very same issue seems to be with IPv6, but haven't tested.

Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@...zenberger.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_input.c  | 2 +-
 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
index e1e5a6a..9bf55b6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int ip_rcv_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
 	struct rtable *rt;
 
-	if (sysctl_ip_early_demux && !skb_dst(skb)) {
+	if (sysctl_ip_early_demux && !skb_dst(skb) && skb->sk == NULL) {
 		const struct net_protocol *ipprot;
 		int protocol = iph->protocol;
 
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
index 5345300..8b7f50c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 
 int ip6_rcv_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	if (sysctl_ip_early_demux && !skb_dst(skb)) {
+	if (sysctl_ip_early_demux && !skb_dst(skb) && skb->sk == NULL) {
 		const struct inet6_protocol *ipprot;
 
 		ipprot = rcu_dereference(inet6_protos[ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr]);
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/