[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140210211825.GB5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:18:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...stprotocols.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jolsa@...hat.com, jmario@...hat.com, fowles@...each.com,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] perf, c2c: Add new tool to analyze cacheline
contention on NUMA systems
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28:55PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> With the introduction of NUMA systems, came the possibility of remote memory accesses.
> Combine those remote memory accesses with contention on the remote node (ie a modified
> cacheline) and you have a possibility for very long latencies. These latencies can
> bottleneck a program.
>
> The program added by these patches, helps detect the situation where two nodes are
> 'tugging' on the same _data_ cacheline. The term used through out this program and
> the various changelogs is called a HITM. This means nodeX went to read a cacheline
> and it was discovered to be loaded in nodeY's LLC cache (hence the cacheHIT). The
> remote cacheline was also in a 'M'odified state thus creating a 'HIT M' for hit in
> a modified state. HITMs can happen locally and remotely. This program's interest
> is mainly in remote HITMs as they cause the longest latencies.
All of that is true of the traditional SMP system too. Just use lower
level caches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists