[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140211001624.GA12851@google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:16:24 -0700
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI: cleanup pci_scan_bridge
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:59:20PM +0100, Andreas Noever wrote:
> I have been reading the code around pci_scan_bridge and noticed a few oddities.
> These patches try to cleanup some of the these things.
>
> Most of the patches make also sense in isolation, but some make more sense with
> the previous ones applied as well. None of the patches fix any observed bugs.
> Patch 5 fixes a (probably harmless) dmesg.
>
> The changes related to CardBus probing are completely untested.
>
> Andreas
>
> Andreas Noever (8):
> PCI: Increment max correctly in pci_scan_bridge.
> PCI: Clarify the "scan anyway" comment in pci_scan_bridge.
> PCI: Assign CardBus bus number only during the second pass.
> PCI: Use request_resource_conflict instead of insert_ for bus numbers.
> PCI: Make sure bus number resources stay within their parents bounds.
> PCI: Remove pci_fixup_parent_subordinate_busnr.
> PCI: Check for child busses which use more bus numbers than allocated.
> PCI: Don't scan random busses in pci_scan_bridge.
>
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
I applied all these to pci/scan-bridge for v3.15, thanks!
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists