linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13 063/120] mm: numa: initialise numa balancing after jump label initialisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140211184825.416454243@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:05:04 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 063/120] mm: numa: initialise numa balancing after jump label initialisation

3.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>

commit c297663c0b3930491a3cb2aba4b6e5a7159c3503 upstream.

The command line parsing takes place before jump labels are initialised
which generates a warning if numa_balancing= is specified and
CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL is set.

On older kernels before commit c4b2c0c5f647 ("static_key: WARN on usage
before jump_label_init was called") the kernel would have crashed.  This
patch enables automatic numa balancing later in the initialisation
process if numa_balancing= is specified.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/mempolicy.c |   17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2657,7 +2657,7 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shar
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
-static bool __initdata numabalancing_override;
+static int __initdata numabalancing_override;
 
 static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)
 {
@@ -2666,9 +2666,15 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_e
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING_DEFAULT_ENABLED))
 		numabalancing_default = true;
 
+	/* Parsed by setup_numabalancing. override == 1 enables, -1 disables */
+	if (numabalancing_override)
+		set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
+
 	if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
-		printk(KERN_INFO "Enabling automatic NUMA balancing. "
-			"Configure with numa_balancing= or the kernel.numa_balancing sysctl");
+		printk(KERN_INFO "%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
+			"Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
+			"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",
+			numabalancing_default ? "Enabling" : "Disabling");
 		set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_default);
 	}
 }
@@ -2678,13 +2684,12 @@ static int __init setup_numabalancing(ch
 	int ret = 0;
 	if (!str)
 		goto out;
-	numabalancing_override = true;
 
 	if (!strcmp(str, "enable")) {
-		set_numabalancing_state(true);
+		numabalancing_override = 1;
 		ret = 1;
 	} else if (!strcmp(str, "disable")) {
-		set_numabalancing_state(false);
+		numabalancing_override = -1;
 		ret = 1;
 	}
 out:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/