[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpommw4=LcyYKvj8rNJgUkOT+_Gh=1kppcDQYm3BuQQe_Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:22:43 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [QUERY]: Is using CPU hotplug right for isolating CPUs?
On 28 January 2014 18:53, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> No, when a single task is running on a full dynticks CPU, the tick is supposed to run
> every seconds. I'm actually suprised it doesn't happen in your traces, did you tweak
> something specific?
Why do we need this 1 second tick currently? And what will happen if I
hotunplug that
CPU and get it back? Would the timer for tick move away from CPU in
question? I see
that when I have changed this 1sec stuff to 300 seconds. But what
would be impact
of that? Will things still work normally?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists