lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:47:26 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to
 contain the hwmon suffix

> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
> >> >> > Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon
> >> >> > device names.
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, where is that documented?
> >> >
> >> > In Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface:
> >> >
> >> > *********************
> >> > * Global attributes *
> >> > *********************
> >> >
> >> > name            The chip name.
> >> >                 This should be a short, lowercase string, not containing
> >> >                 spaces nor dashes, representing the chip name. This is
> >> >                 the only mandatory attribute.
> >> >                 I2C devices get this attribute created automatically.
> >> >                 RO
> >>
> >> Time to revisit this decision....
> >>
> >> So, based on the fact that children device names usually contain
> >> dashes, I do not understand why hwmon would be any special in this
> >> regard. It is possible that the hwmon developers have not faced much
> >> MFD situation before, and so, this was not considered to be handled
> >> like in other subsystems.
> >>
> >> I am proposing to change this "rule"...  Any objection?
> >
> > Prior to proposing such an invasive change which is highly likely to
> > come up against heavy opposition,
> 
> It is possible that someone does not understand why you think it may
> be invasive, right? Could you please explain the reason for that?

The reason is a good one. In the kernel we make every attempt not to
break userspace. By that I mean _any_ userspace application. Userspace
applications which interface with the kernel can do so via a variety of
methods. One of those is Sysfs, where this name you are attempting to
change appears. The userspace applications already mentioned parse for
these devices, regex:ing for '-' separators. If you add an additional
'-' separator there is a chance that these applications will get
confused and break without warning. 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ