[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140211104030.GG2107@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:40:30 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Tom Musta <tommusta@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Raghavendra KT <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:23:51PM +0530, Raghavendra KT wrote:
> How much important to have holder information for PPC? From my
> previous experiment
> on x86, it was lock-waiter preemption which is problematic rather than
> lock-holder preemption.
It's something very special to IBM pSeries: the hypervisor can assign
fractions of physical CPUs to guests. Sometimes a guest with 4 quarter
CPUs will be faster than 1 monoprocessor. (correct me if I'm wrong).
The directed yield resolves the silly situation when holder and waiter
reside on the same physical CPU, as I understand it.
x86 has nothing comparable.
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists