| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <52FA0D6E.9090304@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:45:50 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Nishanth Peethambaran <nishanth.p@...il.com>,
Marc <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers: of: add initialization code for reserved
memory
Hello,
On 2014-02-05 12:05, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:09:29 +0100, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds device tree support for contiguous and reserved memory
> > regions defined in device tree.
> >
> > Large memory blocks can be reliably reserved only during early boot.
> > This must happen before the whole memory management subsystem is
> > initialized, because we need to ensure that the given contiguous blocks
> > are not yet allocated by kernel. Also it must happen before kernel
> > mappings for the whole low memory are created, to ensure that there will
> > be no mappings (for reserved blocks) or mapping with special properties
> > can be created (for CMA blocks). This all happens before device tree
> > structures are unflattened, so we need to get reserved memory layout
> > directly from fdt.
> >
> > Later, those reserved memory regions are assigned to devices on each
> > device structure initialization.
> >
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > [joshc: rework to implement new DT binding, provide mechanism for
> > plugging in new reserved-memory node handlers via
> > RESERVEDMEM_OF_DECLARE]
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
> > [mszyprow: little code cleanup]
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 +
> > drivers/of/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 219 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/of/platform.c | 7 ++
> > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 11 ++
> > include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h | 62 +++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 306 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> > index c6973f101a3e..aba13df56f3a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> > @@ -75,4 +75,10 @@ config OF_MTD
> > depends on MTD
> > def_bool y
> >
> > +config OF_RESERVED_MEM
> > + depends on HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> > + def_bool y
> > + help
> > + Helpers to allow for reservation of memory regions
> > +
> > endmenu # OF
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile
> > index efd05102c405..ed9660adad77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/of/Makefile
> > @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_MDIO) += of_mdio.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_PCI) += of_pci.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_PCI_IRQ) += of_pci_irq.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_OF_MTD) += of_mtd.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_RESERVED_MEM) += of_reserved_mem.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f17cd56e68d9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Device tree based initialization code for reserved memory.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > + * http://www.samsung.com
> > + * Author: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > + * Author: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
> > + * License or (at your optional) any later version of the license.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > +
> > +#define MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS 16
> > +static struct reserved_mem reserved_mem[MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS];
> > +static int reserved_mem_count;
> > +
> > +int __init of_parse_flat_dt_reg(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> > + phys_addr_t *base, phys_addr_t *size)
>
> Useful utility function; move to drivers/of/fdt.c
>
> > +{
> > + unsigned long len;
> > + __be32 *prop;
> > +
> > + prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &len);
> > + if (!prop)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (len < (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells) * sizeof(__be32)) {
> > + pr_err("Reserved memory: invalid reg property in '%s' node.\n",
> > + uname);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> This is /okay/ for an initial implementation, but it is naive. While I
> suggested making #address-cells and #size-cells equal the root node
> values for the purpose of simplicity, it should still be perfectly valid
> to have different values if the ranges property is correctly formed.
>
> > +
> > + *base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, &prop);
> > + *size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, &prop);
>
> Future enhancement; allow for parsing more than just the first reg
> tuple.
One more question. Does it really makes any sense to support more than
one tuple
for reg property? For consistency we should also allow more than one
entry in
size, align and alloc-ranges property, but I don't see any benefits for
defining
more than one range for a single region. Same can be achieved by
defining more
regions instead if one really needs such configuration.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists