linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/8] perf/x86/uncore: fix initialization of cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1392132015-14521-2-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:20:07 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
	ak@...ux.intel.com, zheng.z.yan@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] perf/x86/uncore: fix initialization of cpumask

On certain processors, the uncore PMU boxes may only be
msr-bsed or PCI-based. But in both cases, the cpumask,
suggesting on which CPUs to monitor to get full coverage
of the particular PMU, must be created.

However with the current code base, the cpumask was only
created on processor which had at least one MSR-based
uncore PMU. This patch removes that restriction and
ensures the cpumask is created even when there is no
msr-based PMU. For instance, on SNB client where only
a PCI-based memory controller PMU is supported.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c |   61 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 29c2487..fe4255b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -3764,7 +3764,7 @@ static void __init uncore_cpu_setup(void *dummy)
 
 static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
 {
-	int ret, cpu, max_cores;
+	int ret, max_cores;
 
 	max_cores = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
 	switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
@@ -3808,29 +3808,6 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	get_online_cpus();
-
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-		int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
-
-		for_each_cpu(i, &uncore_cpu_mask) {
-			if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i)) {
-				phys_id = -1;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-		if (phys_id < 0)
-			continue;
-
-		uncore_cpu_prepare(cpu, phys_id);
-		uncore_event_init_cpu(cpu);
-	}
-	on_each_cpu(uncore_cpu_setup, NULL, 1);
-
-	register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
-
-	put_online_cpus();
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3859,6 +3836,41 @@ static int __init uncore_pmus_register(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void uncore_cpumask_init(void)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	/*
+	 * ony invoke once from msr or pci init code
+	 */
+	if (!cpumask_empty(&uncore_cpu_mask))
+		return;
+
+	get_online_cpus();
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
+
+		for_each_cpu(i, &uncore_cpu_mask) {
+			if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i)) {
+				phys_id = -1;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		if (phys_id < 0)
+			continue;
+
+		uncore_cpu_prepare(cpu, phys_id);
+		uncore_event_init_cpu(cpu);
+	}
+	on_each_cpu(uncore_cpu_setup, NULL, 1);
+
+	register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
+
+	put_online_cpus();
+}
+
+
 static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -3877,6 +3889,7 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
 		uncore_pci_exit();
 		goto fail;
 	}
+	uncore_cpumask_init();
 
 	uncore_pmus_register();
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/