[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402101851190.3447@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:54:20 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] hugetlb: add hugepagesnid= command-line option
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> HugeTLB command-line option hugepages= allows the user to specify how many
> huge pages should be allocated at boot. On NUMA systems, this argument
> automatically distributes huge pages allocation among nodes, which can
> be undesirable.
>
And when hugepages can no longer be allocated on a node because it is too
small, the remaining hugepages are distributed over nodes with memory
available, correct?
> The hugepagesnid= option introduced by this commit allows the user
> to specify which NUMA nodes should be used to allocate boot-time HugeTLB
> pages. For example, hugepagesnid=0,2,2G will allocate two 2G huge pages
> from node 0 only. More details on patch 3/4 and patch 4/4.
>
Strange, it would seem better to just reserve as many hugepages as you
want so that you get the desired number on each node and then free the
ones you don't need at runtime.
That probably doesn't work because we can't free very large hugepages that
are reserved at boot, would fixing that issue reduce the need for this
patchset?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists