[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMwXhPTkrUUaUL-H_0fvZBO9_kt4jqKXs5BJYthDfu0_1c3xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:13:37 +0000
From: Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Rename the device ids to
contain the hwmon suffix
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
> Additionally, dashes are explicitly forbidden in hwmon
> device names.
Also, where is that documented?
I do not think you can make such a decision, and you will realize that
once you begin to think a bit out of the box and look around. See how
other children are managed for MFD devices. "driver-subsystem" is a
pretty common a schema. I do not really see any point in forbidding
dashes currently. Please do elaborate about the reasons, and the fact
that why it is undocuemented.
Also, I currently do not understand what you are suggesting: just
leave this technically unreasonable situation as is for compatibility
reasons? There is no better support in place for appending further
alternative names?
In any case, at the very least, I hope the lesson is learnt for the
future from this past mistake. If a chip is MFD'ish, a subdevice
driver should not ever be added with such an id.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists