[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2194247.ngWdBSP92t@avalon>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:17:59 +0100
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Turn of_match_node into a static inline when CONFIG_OF isn't set
Hi Josh,
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 12:08:46 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:20:49PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 10:48:26 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 08:41:08 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:36:51PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [..]
>
> > > I am a bit weary about having an of_match_node() user that both directly
> > > dereferences the result (i.e. of_match_node(matches, np)->data) _and_
> > > builds when !CONFIG_OF; most likely due to a traumatic childhood event
> > > where demons flew out my nose.
> >
> > I can assign the intermediate value to a variable before dereferencing it
> > and drop my of_match_node() patch if it makes everybody happier.
>
> Assuming you also intend to handle the case of_match_node() may return
> NULL, or otherwise prevent the execution of this codepath when
> !CONFIG_OF, then, yes, that sounds good.
I'll condition the call of that function to IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF), yes.
> It sure would be convenient if platform_device had a 'const struct
> of_device_id *of_id_entry' member similar to the existing struct
> platform_device_id one, that was set up during platform device matching.
> Most platform_driver users of of_match_node() would simply go away.
There's definitely room for improvement (although in this particular case the
driver handles an I2C device, not a platform device).
I've always been slightly bothered by the duplication of matching information
between native/legacy device IDs and OF device IDs. I haven't really given
this a thought though, but I believe something should be done.
I've just remembered that, in the I2C case, the I2C core selects the
appropriate i2c_device_id matching entry based on the compatible string,
provided that the i2c_device_id table matches the of_device_id table with I2C
device names set to the OF compatible string with the vendor prefix stripped
off. Just food for thought.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists