[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9yfHzoBCBpUqhmOMvXmkR510EViBcciveD0rRNtiHxMRC9TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:47:15 +0530
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To: Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...sung.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...il.com>,
Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Boot all secondary cores on Exynos SoC's
Hi Tarek,
On 11 February 2014 07:45, Tarek Dakhran <t.dakhran@...sung.com> wrote:
> Due to implementation of exynos_boot_secondary function
> only one secondary core boots on Exynos SoC's.
Even without this patch I could boot the secondary CPUs on Exynos4210, 4412 and
5250 based boards with the latest Linux kernel (v3.14-rc2+). Is this
patch required for
a specific use case or am I missing something?
---
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists