[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1392148971.3835.15.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:02:51 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Nishanth Peethambaran <nishanth.p@...il.com>,
Marc <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers: of: add initialization code for
reserved memory
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 19:01 +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> > except that the former IMHO better suits the definition of memory
> > region, which I see as a single contiguous range of memory and can be
> > simplified to have a single reg entry per region.
>
> My point is rather if multiple reg tuples are found in a reserved memory
> node, the kernel must respect them and reserve the memory. I'm not
> arguing about whether or not that makes for a good binding.
agreed.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists