linux-kernel - Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:50:27 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:40:43PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:

 > None of the XFS code disables interrupts in that path, not does is
 > call outside XFS except to dispatch IO. The stack is pretty deep at
 > this point and I know that the standard (non stacked) IO stack can
 > consume >3kb of stack space when it gets down to having to do memory
 > reclaim during GFP_NOIO allocation at the lowest level of SCSI
 > drivers. Stack overruns typically show up with symptoms like we are
 > seeing.
 > ..
 > 
 > Dave, before chasing ghosts, can you (like Eric originally asked)
 > turn on stack overrun detection?

CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW ? Already turned on.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/