linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86, apic: Remove support for Summit and ES7000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:39:28 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Andrey Panin <pazke@...pac.ru>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Dobson <colpatch@...ibm.com>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Garry Forsgren <garry.forsgren@...sys.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86, apic: Remove support for Summit and ES7000

Running tests on this branch, will push it into tip tomorrow if ok.

On February 11, 2014 11:06:45 PM PST, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/11/2014 06:53 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> > Hi Ingo, Peter, and Thomas,
>> > 
>> >  [ Be aware of bouncing emails on the cc, it includes the
>last-known email
>> >    addresses of the authors of these subarchitectures and may
>bounce. ]
>> > 
>> > If you agree, please pull from:
>> > 
>> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rientjes/linux.git
>x86/apic
>> > 
>> >   # HEAD: 7cf6c94591bbf3dbe3bf9573a6551328ad76d885 x86, apic:
>Remove support for IBM Summit/EXA chipset
>> > 
>> > or apply individually.  This branch is based on x86/apic.
>> > 
>> > This is the removal of Summit and ES7000 subarchitectures from x86.
> I'd 
>> > like to do the same for NumaQ, but am still researching if we can
>really 
>> > do away with it.
>> 
>> Nice.
>
>I'm fine with this too.
>
>Thanks,
>
>	Ingo

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/