linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:38:17 +0100
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ath10k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to
 pci_disable_msi()

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:31:43PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I haven't put these in my branch, so you can take them.
> 
> Alexander has a whole batch of network driver updates that I think David
> Miller is going to apply; would it make sense to include these in that
> batch?
> 
> There's also the wil6210 patch for
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c, which seems like it maybe
> could be in that batch, too.

Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your
tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches
altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi
branch though.

> Bjorn

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/