linux-kernel - Re: 3.12: ethernet controller missing after resuming from suspend to RAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1717405.VfecqV3UgO@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:04:28 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Bastien Traverse <bastien.traverse@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.12: ethernet controller missing after resuming from suspend to RAM

On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 08:44:13 AM Francis Moreau wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 07:17:37 PM Peter Wu wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 12:42:37 Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:39:29PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>> _STA() returns 0x0A instead of 0x0F. Could there be something missing in
> >>>>> the ACPI hotplug code that overlooks this and removes the device on
> >>>>> resume?
> >>>>
> >>>> That is possible.  Actually even quite likely, but let's wait for the
> >>>> response from Peter.
> >>>
> >>> Here's a hack that should take the 0xa return value into consideration. It
> >>> turned out that this case is even mentioned in the ACPI spec.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>
> >>
> >> This works, the devices are not lost anymore after resume. dmesg
> >> mentions the 04:00.* devices at resume compared to the unpatched kernel:
> >>
> >> [   42.650721] PM: Finishing wakeup.
> >> [   42.650768] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   42.650772] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   42.650874] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   42.650722] Restarting tasks ... done.
> >> [   42.650985] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state
> >> [   42.650988] video LNXVIDEO:01: Restoring backlight state
> >> [   43.124208] ACPI: \_SB_.AC__: ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK event: unsupported
> >> [   43.128401] jme 0000:04:00.5: irq 50 for MSI/MSI-X
> >> [   43.153005] jme 0000:04:00.5 eth0: Link is down
> >> [   43.153030] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> >> [   43.154364] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
> >> [   43.162307] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: Radio type=0x1-0x3-0x1
> >> [   43.276220] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP01
> >> [   43.276223] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP01
> >> [   43.276257] xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276267] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP02
> >> [   43.276268] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP02
> >> [   43.276355] sdhci-pci 0000:04:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276368] pci 0000:04:00.2: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276381] jmb38x_ms 0000:04:00.3: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276393] jme 0000:04:00.5: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.276398] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: Bus check notify on \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   43.276399] acpiphp_glue: hotplug_event: re-enumerating slots under \_SB_.PCI0.RP03
> >> [   43.276491] iwlwifi 0000:05:00.0: no hotplug settings from platform
> >> [   43.277214] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
> >>
> >> Rafael, do you want me to test the other patch as well?
> > 
> > No, thanks!
> > 
> > Mika, I'll add a changelog to your patch and queue it up as a fix for 3.14.
> > 
> 
> Thanks guys for solving this issue !
> 
> Rafael, could this be submitted to stable trees (at least 3.12, 3.13) as
> well ?

Yes, I have marked it for stable.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/