linux-kernel - Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:52:19 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Slap the check in vfs_create(), see if interrupts had been disabled by it or
> by something in ->create().  Since it's reproducible...

path_openat() starts off with a get_empty_filp(), which allocates a
file pointer with GFP_KERNEL. So that should have triggered the
might_sleep warning if irq's were already disabled at that point.

So it's not before that - in particular, it's not in the signal
handling or do_coredump() paths.

Also, at least xfs_buf_lock() - which is much deeper in that chain -
does a down(&bp->b_sema). I'm disguested that that doesn't have a
might_sleep() in it.

Dave, mind adding a "might_sleep()" to the top of
"down[_interruptible]()". It's silly to not have coverage of semaphore
use in bad contexts.

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/