linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140212162728.GB21336@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:27:28 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:04:01AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny
> > and ready to go.  Not so with these releases.  Maybe it's the horrid
> > weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or
> > something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world
> > screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking
> > the build every other patch.  Some developers decided to get into the
> > act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable
> > patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous
> > times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and
> > take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie...
> > 
> Come on, compared to me you are never grumpy.
> 
> > Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't
> > trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and
> > run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater.
> > 
> > You have been warned.
> > 
> Hmm ... not sure if I want to take that risk :-). Going to be fun.
> And looking for volunteers to provide me with a really great test suite
> which I can run in qemu (and which doesn't take me days to set up).

What about the new rcu test suite that has been added to the kernel
tree?

> > -----------------
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.13.3 release.
> > There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Feb 13 18:47:55 UTC 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 126 pass: 122 skipped: 4 fail: 0
> 
> qemu tests all passed.
> 
> Results are as expected (even though that may be unexpected in this case ;-).

Yeah, it lives!   Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/