[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140212164019.GE25957@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:40:19 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alexandre.torgue@...com" <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] phy: miphy365x: Add Device Tree bindings for the
MiPHY365x
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:03:02PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> The MiPHY365x is a Generic PHY which can serve various SATA or PCIe
> devices. It has 2 ports which it can use for either; both SATA, both
> PCIe or one of each in any configuration.
>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fdfa7ca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +STMicroelectronics STi MIPHY365x PHY binding
> +============================================
> +
> +This binding describes a miphy device that is used to control PHY hardware
> +for SATA and PCIe.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Should be "st,miphy365x-phy"
> +- #phy-cells: Should be 2 (See example)
The first example has #phy-cells = <1>.
What do the cells mean? What are the expected values?
> +- reg: Address and length of the register set for the device
> +- reg-names: The names of the register addresses corresponding to the
> + registers filled in "reg".
Whenever there is a ${PROP}-names property, there should be a list of
explicit values, and a description of how it relates to ${PROP}. Without
that it's a bit useless.
Please provide an explicit list of expected names here.
I assume here what you want is something like:
- reg: a list of address + length pairs, one for each entry in reg-names
- reg-names: should contain:
* "sata0" for the sata0 control registers...
* "sata1" ...
* "pcie0" ...
* "pcie1" ...
> +- st,syscfg : Should be a phandle of the syscfg node.
What's this used for?
Cheers,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists