linux-kernel - [3.13.2] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1799469.xr2i5c36Hj@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:16:49 +0100
From:	Paweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@...k.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [3.13.2] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency.

Hi,

i've noticed on my server that dmesg contains following info:

(...)
[  141.192868] FS-Cache: Loaded
[  141.203008] FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching
[ 1383.278845] Key type dns_resolver registered
[ 1383.293014] NFS: Registering the id_resolver key type
[ 1383.293027] Key type id_resolver registered
[ 1383.293028] Key type id_legacy registered
[ 3998.115273] perf samples too long (2502 > 2500), lowering 
kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50100
[16855.582522] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency

could someone put some light on the last line?

BR,
Paweł.

please CC on reply.

-- 
gpg key fingerprint = 60B4 9886 AD53 EB3E 88BB 1EB5 C52E D01B 683B 9411
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/