[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140212182336.GD5496@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:23:38 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@...adcom.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: move SRCU grace period work to power efficient
workqueue
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:47:29AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:08:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>
> Thank you all, queued for 3.15.
>
> We should also have some facility for moving the SRCU workqueues to
> housekeeping/timekeeping kthreads in the NO_HZ_FULL case. Or does
> this patch already have that effect?
Kevin Hilman and me plan to try to bring a new Kconfig option that could let
us control the unbound workqueues affinity through sysfs.
The feature actually exist currently but is only enabled for workqueues that
have WQ_SYSFS. Writeback and raid5 are the only current users.
See for example: /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/writeback/cpumask
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists