linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAErSpo47k8WuHded1TnHoRedHHLe-Sk7kKsXcR4XjKmQPb0Ggg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:40:26 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
Cc:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ath10k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> writes:
>
>>> Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your
>>> tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches
>>> altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi
>>> branch though.
>>
>> It's in pci/msi, but that's not in my -next branch yet, so I can
>> easily drop it.  Do drivers/net/wireless patches normally follow a
>> different path than the other drivers/net patches?  The wil6210 and
>> ath10k patches look just like the others in the 34-patch series (bnx2,
>> bnx2x, tg3, bna, cxgb3, etc.), so I thought it would make more sense
>> to include them there.
>
> ath10k patches normally go through my ath.git tree to Linville and then
> to David Miller. To avoid conflicts I would prefer to take ath10k
> patches to my tree whenever possible.

OK, I won't do anything with ath10k (I haven't applied it anywhere).
And if Alexander re-posts the networking series (I think he might, to
add a pci_enable_msix_exact() interface), maybe he can include wil6210
with that series.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/