[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140212214209.GA4136@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:42:09 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: trond.myklebust@...marydata.com
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Question about nfs4_destroy_session()
Hello, Trond,
In nfs4_destroy_session(), there is an rcu_dereference() that looks to
leak the returned pointer out of an RCU read-side critical section.
If the pointed-to object might have just now been created, this is a
bug because xprt_destroy_backchannel() dereferences this pointer.
So, does xprt_destroy_backchannel() exclude creation-side code? (If so,
no bug -- but a comment might be good.)
Thanx, Paul
void nfs4_destroy_session(struct nfs4_session *session)
{
struct rpc_xprt *xprt;
struct rpc_cred *cred;
cred = nfs4_get_clid_cred(session->clp);
nfs4_proc_destroy_session(session, cred);
if (cred)
put_rpccred(cred);
rcu_read_lock();
xprt = rcu_dereference(session->clp->cl_rpcclient->cl_xprt);
rcu_read_unlock();
dprintk("%s Destroy backchannel for xprt %p\n",
__func__, xprt);
xprt_destroy_backchannel(xprt, NFS41_BC_MIN_CALLBACKS);
nfs4_destroy_session_slot_tables(session);
kfree(session);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists