[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52FAFD2D.2090306@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:18:45 +0530
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi Stephen,
On 02/12/2014 08:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c: In function 'idle_loop_prolog':
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c:32:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ppc64_runlatch_off' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> ppc64_runlatch_off();
> ^
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c: In function 'idle_loop_epilog':
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c:52:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ppc64_runlatch_on' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> ppc64_runlatch_on();
> ^
>
> Caused by commit d8c6ad3184ca ("sched/idle, PPC: Remove redundant
> cpuidle_idle_call()").
Ok so after the commit
d8c6ad3184ca651:sched/idle, PPC: Remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call()
reintroduced ppc64_runlatch_off/on() in drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c
the cleanup caused by the commit "c0c4301c54adde05:pseries/cpuidle:
Remove redundant call to ppc64_runlatch_off() in cpu idle routines"
now needs to be introduced in part.
Below is the patch which should fix this. This is based on top of tip-tree.
Thanks
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpuidle/pseries: Fix fallout caused due to cleanup in pseries cpuidle backend driver
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Commit "d8c6ad3184ca651:sched/idle, PPC: Remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call()"
reintroduced ppc64_runlatch_off/on() in the pseries cpuidle backend driver.
Hence the cleanup caused by the commit "c0c4301c54adde05:pseries/cpuidle:
Remove redundant call to ppc64_runlatch_off() in cpu idle routines" in
conjuction with the commit d8c6ad3184ca651 causes a build failure.
Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c
index d486489..6f7b019 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <asm/reg.h>
#include <asm/machdep.h>
#include <asm/firmware.h>
+#include <asm/runlatch.h>
#include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
struct cpuidle_driver pseries_idle_driver = {
>
> I have used the tip tree from next-20140210 again today (since
> next-20140211 was broken differently).
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists