[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877g8zg0ed.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:54:42 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:27:38 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Users have reported being unable to trace non-signed modules loaded
>> > within a kernel supporting module signature.
>>
>> External modules should strive to get out of the 'crap' and
>> 'felony law breaker' categories and we should not make it
>> easier for them to linger in a broken state.
>>
>> Nacked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Well, distributions which sign their modules are sending a pretty strong
"go away" signal already.
I'm ambivalent towards out-of-tree modules, so not tempted unless I see
a bug report indicating a concrete problem. Then we can discuss...
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists