| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <ad0829225181092a8c3c599ecc68bdf1d1e5544f.1392273722.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:20:16 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com,
swarren@...dotorg.org, kgene.kim@...sung.com, jinchoi@...adcom.com,
tianyu.lan@...el.com, sebastian.capella@...aro.org,
jhbird.choi@...sung.com, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V5 1/7] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate
This patch adds cpufreq suspend/resume calls to dpm_{suspend|resume}_noirq() for
handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors.
Lan Tianyu (Intel) & Jinhyuk Choi (Broadcom) found an issue where tunables
configuration for clusters/sockets with non-boot CPUs was getting lost after
suspend/resume, as we were notifying governors with CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT on
removal of the last cpu for that policy and so deallocating memory for tunables.
This is fixed by this patch as we don't allow any operation on governors after
device suspend and before device resume now.
Reported-and-tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Reported-by: Jinhyuk Choi <jinchoi@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 3 +++
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 8 ++++++++
3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index deb4e02..da49882 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/async.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <trace/events/power.h>
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
@@ -581,6 +582,7 @@ static void dpm_resume_noirq(pm_message_t state)
dpm_show_time(starttime, state, "noirq");
resume_device_irqs();
cpuidle_resume();
+ cpufreq_resume();
}
/**
@@ -1061,6 +1063,7 @@ static int dpm_suspend_noirq(pm_message_t state)
ktime_t starttime = ktime_get();
int error = 0;
+ cpufreq_suspend();
cpuidle_pause();
suspend_device_irqs();
mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 08ca8c9..cb23858 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <trace/events/power.h>
@@ -47,6 +48,9 @@ static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN], cpufreq_cpu_governor);
#endif
+/* Flag to suspend/resume CPUFreq governors */
+static bool cpufreq_suspended;
+
static inline bool has_target(void)
{
return cpufreq_driver->target_index || cpufreq_driver->target;
@@ -1576,6 +1580,41 @@ static struct subsys_interface cpufreq_interface = {
.remove_dev = cpufreq_remove_dev,
};
+void cpufreq_suspend(void)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+
+ if (!has_target())
+ return;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: Suspending Governors\n", __func__);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list)
+ if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor for policy: %p\n",
+ __func__, policy);
+
+ cpufreq_suspended = true;
+}
+
+void cpufreq_resume(void)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+
+ if (!has_target())
+ return;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: Resuming Governors\n", __func__);
+
+ cpufreq_suspended = false;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list)
+ if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
+ || __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor for policy: %p\n",
+ __func__, policy);
+}
+
/**
* cpufreq_bp_suspend - Prepare the boot CPU for system suspend.
*
@@ -1869,6 +1908,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_governor *gov = NULL;
#endif
+ /* Don't start any governor operations if we are entering suspend */
+ if (cpufreq_suspended)
+ return 0;
+
if (policy->governor->max_transition_latency &&
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency >
policy->governor->max_transition_latency) {
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 4d89e0e..94ed907 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -296,6 +296,14 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
+void cpufreq_suspend(void);
+void cpufreq_resume(void);
+#else
+static inline void cpufreq_suspend(void) {}
+static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
+#endif
+
/*********************************************************************
* CPUFREQ NOTIFIER INTERFACE *
*********************************************************************/
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists