| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3744167b-7f37-4a86-8569-2a17bd5d3845@CH1EHSMHS035.ehs.local> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:00:10 +0100 From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: <michal.simek@...inx.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <sthokal@...inx.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <monstr@...str.eu>, <John.Linn@...inx.com>, <anirudh@...inx.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] Xilinx axi ethernet patches On 02/13/2014 01:18 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:55:34 +0100 > >> I have exctracted patches which I have in our >> xilinx git tree which are missing in the mainline. >> >> The first two patches fix compilation error and >> warnings. Then 5 feature patches >> and the rest is OF cleanup and with kernel-doc >> and checkpatch problems. > > You should not combine bug fix and feature patches. > > Rather, you should submit bug fixes against the 'net' tree. Then when > those bug fixes get applied and propagate to the 'net-next' tree you > can submit the feature patches and cleanups against the 'net-next' > tree. Ok. I will. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists