linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/14] Xilinx axi ethernet patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:00:10 +0100
From:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<michal.simek@...inx.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<sthokal@...inx.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<monstr@...str.eu>, <John.Linn@...inx.com>, <anirudh@...inx.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] Xilinx axi ethernet patches

On 02/13/2014 01:18 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:55:34 +0100
> 
>> I have exctracted patches which I have in our
>> xilinx git tree which are missing in the mainline.
>>
>> The first two patches fix compilation error and
>> warnings. Then 5 feature patches
>> and the rest is OF cleanup and with kernel-doc
>> and checkpatch problems.
> 
> You should not combine bug fix and feature patches.
> 
> Rather, you should submit bug fixes against the 'net' tree.  Then when
> those bug fixes get applied and propagate to the 'net-next' tree you
> can submit the feature patches and cleanups against the 'net-next'
> tree.

Ok. I will.

Thanks,
Michal


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/