lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52FC79DF.9060204@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:53:03 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...nel.org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

On 02/07/2014 07:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this
> information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the
> cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the
> idle_stamp information in core.c by moving it up to the caller. The
> idle_balance function returns true in case a balancing occured and the cpu
> won't be idle, false if no balance happened and the cpu is going idle.
> 
> Cc: mingo@...nel.org
> Cc: alex.shi@...aro.org
> Cc: peterz@...radead.org
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>



-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ