[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140213110615.GA17359@in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:36:15 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
paulus@...ba.org, oleg@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, walken@...gle.com,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/51] CPU hotplug: Provide lockless versions of callback
registration functions
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:26:20PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> get/put_online_cpus() is a reader-lock and concurrent executions are
> allowed among the readers. They won't be serialized until a cpu
> online/offline operation begins. By replacing this lock with
> cpu_maps_update_begin/done(), we now serialize all readers.
We're not serializing all the readers, just the ones which want to
register/unregister their cpu-hotplug notifiers. This is a one-off
event which typically happens during a module_init() or a
module_exit() time. So this patchset does not replace
get/put_online_cpus() if that is the concern!
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists