linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Convert to be a platform driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:16:07 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:	Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Convert to be a
 platform driver

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Jean Delvare wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:58:17 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > The MFD driver has now been added, so this driver is now being adopted to be a
> > > subdevice driver on top of it. This means, the i2c driver usage is being
> > > converted to platform driver usage all around.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
> > > ---
> > > This patch has been compile tested only and will be tested with real hardware,
> > > but early reviews to catch any trivial issues would be welcome.
> > >  drivers/hwmon/Kconfig   |   2 +-
> > >  drivers/hwmon/max6650.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > >  2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > >  /*
> > >   * Insmod parameters
> > > @@ -105,24 +108,23 @@ module_param(clock, int, S_IRUGO);
> > >  
> > >  #define DIV_FROM_REG(reg) (1 << (reg & 7))
> > >  
> > > -static int max6650_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > > -			 const struct i2c_device_id *id);
> > > -static int max6650_init_client(struct i2c_client *client);
> > > -static int max6650_remove(struct i2c_client *client);
> > > +static int max6650_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > > +static int max6650_init_client(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > > +static int max6650_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > >  static struct max6650_data *max6650_update_device(struct device *dev);
> > 
> > It would be good to remove these forward declarations in the future.
> > 
> > If no one volunteers I'll happily do it.
> 
> Guenter just did:
> 
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2014-February/041224.html

Nice, FWIW:
  Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>  

> Any change to the max6650 driver should go on top of his patch series
> to avoid conflicts:
> 
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2014-February/041223.html

Do you have a tree Laszlo can rebase on top of?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/