[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402130910520.22057@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:11:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: x86_pmu_start WARN_ON.
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > I'll see if I can run through the reproduction case by hand.
>
> I've come up with an even simpler test case with all of the extraneous
> settings removed. Included below.
>
> It is triggered in this case when you have:
>
> An event group of breakpoint, cycles, branches
> An event of instructions with precise=1
> A tracepoint
>
> and then you close the tracepoint.
and for what it's worth, it's the cycles event (type=0 config=0) that's
causing the WARN_ON.
It looks like I'm going to have to resort to sprinkling the code with
printk()s to solve this one.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists