[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1392301403.2585.11.camel@e37108.spectralink.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:23:23 +0100
From: Stefan Sørensen
<stefan.sorensen@...ctralink.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC: <grant.likely@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dp83640: Get pin and master/slave configuration
from DT
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:19 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > +- dp83640,slave: If present, this phy will be slave to another dp83640
> > + on the same mdio bus.
>
> Wouldn't it be more natural to have one "dp83640,master" property
> rather than multiple slave properties?
I wanted to keep the common case of a single phy simple, i.e. no need to
specify any master/slave properties.
> Most of these pr_err lines are a bit _way_ too long for coding style.
I will fix that in the next version.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists