[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN+gG=H+ix0g+ugLTA1tdXUEU_anyn3JCr0COn8gkKh5xMTwRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:46:56 -0500
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] HID: sony: remove hid_output_raw_report calls
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:47 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
> <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> wrote:
>> We can not directly change the underlying struct hid_ll_driver here
>> as we did for hdev->hid_output_raw_report.
>> So allocate a struct ll_driver, and replace the old one when removing
>> the device.
>> To get a fully functional driver, we must also split the function
>> sixaxis_usb_output_raw_report() in 2, one regarding output_report, and
>> the other for raw_request.
>
> Sorry, i cannot follow here. Could you explain why this is needed? And
Well, as mentioned in the original comments, the sixaxis has two problem:
- when you send an output report, you should call hid_hw_raw_request
instead (though there is an interrupt output endpoint)
- when you send a raw_request, you should drop the reportID in the
buffer you are sending, but keep it in the SET_REPORT call... (quite
annoying).
Splitting this in two (it was all implemented in hid_output_report)
allows to transparently use the hid_hw_call, not matter who calls
what.
> I also don't think you're supposed to change the ll_driver unlocked.
> The real ll_driver might access it in any way. I don't think we do it
> right now, but it might happen.
Yeah, I am not a big fan of this either. My other concern regarding
that is the dependency against usb, while it could be a uHID device.
>
> Why can't we introduce QUIRK flags that make HID core drop the
> report_id for outgoing messages?
I did not want to come with because it would make the bright new
ll_transport interface ugly, but this may be the only way to have
something generic and drop the usb dependency and the races that may
appears (plus the ugly alloc/free).
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> Thanks
> David
>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hid/hid-sony.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
>> index d980943..dbbcd0c8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
>> @@ -507,6 +507,8 @@ struct sony_sc {
>> struct work_struct state_worker;
>> struct power_supply battery;
>>
>> + struct hid_ll_driver *prev_ll_driver;
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SONY_FF
>> __u8 left;
>> __u8 right;
>> @@ -760,38 +762,52 @@ static int sony_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
>>
>> /*
>> * The Sony Sixaxis does not handle HID Output Reports on the Interrupt EP
>> - * like it should according to usbhid/hid-core.c::usbhid_output_raw_report()
>> + * like it should according to usbhid/hid-core.c::usbhid_output_report()
>> * so we need to override that forcing HID Output Reports on the Control EP.
>> - *
>> - * There is also another issue about HID Output Reports via USB, the Sixaxis
>> - * does not want the report_id as part of the data packet, so we have to
>> - * discard buf[0] when sending the actual control message, even for numbered
>> - * reports, humpf!
>> */
>> -static int sixaxis_usb_output_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid, __u8 *buf,
>> - size_t count, unsigned char report_type)
>> +static int sixaxis_usb_output_report(struct hid_device *hid, __u8 *buf,
>> + size_t count)
>> +{
>> + return hid_hw_raw_request(hid, buf[0], buf, count, HID_OUTPUT_REPORT,
>> + HID_REQ_SET_REPORT);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * There is also another issue about the SET_REPORT command via USB,
>> + * the Sixaxis does not want the report_id as part of the data packet, so
>> + * we have to discard buf[0] when sending the actual control message, even
>> + * for numbered reports, humpf!
>> + */
>> +static int sixaxis_usb_raw_request(struct hid_device *hid,
>> + unsigned char reportnum, __u8 *buf,
>> + size_t len, unsigned char rtype, int reqtype)
>> {
>> struct usb_interface *intf = to_usb_interface(hid->dev.parent);
>> struct usb_device *dev = interface_to_usbdev(intf);
>> struct usb_host_interface *interface = intf->cur_altsetting;
>> - int report_id = buf[0];
>> int ret;
>> + u8 usb_dir;
>> + unsigned int usb_pipe;
>>
>> - if (report_type == HID_OUTPUT_REPORT) {
>> + if (reqtype == HID_REQ_SET_REPORT) {
>> /* Don't send the Report ID */
>> buf++;
>> - count--;
>> + len--;
>> + usb_dir = USB_DIR_OUT;
>> + usb_pipe = usb_sndctrlpipe(dev, 0);
>> + } else {
>> + usb_dir = USB_DIR_IN;
>> + usb_pipe = usb_rcvctrlpipe(dev, 0);
>> }
>>
>> - ret = usb_control_msg(dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(dev, 0),
>> - HID_REQ_SET_REPORT,
>> - USB_DIR_OUT | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
>> - ((report_type + 1) << 8) | report_id,
>> - interface->desc.bInterfaceNumber, buf, count,
>> + ret = usb_control_msg(dev, usb_pipe, reqtype,
>> + usb_dir | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE,
>> + ((rtype + 1) << 8) | reportnum,
>> + interface->desc.bInterfaceNumber, buf, len,
>> USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT);
>>
>> - /* Count also the Report ID, in case of an Output report. */
>> - if (ret > 0 && report_type == HID_OUTPUT_REPORT)
>> + /* Count also the Report ID. */
>> + if (ret > 0 && reqtype == HID_REQ_SET_REPORT)
>> ret++;
>>
>> return ret;
>> @@ -1047,7 +1063,7 @@ static void sixaxis_state_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>> buf[10] |= sc->led_state[2] << 3;
>> buf[10] |= sc->led_state[3] << 4;
>>
>> - hid_output_raw_report(sc->hdev, buf, sizeof(buf), HID_OUTPUT_REPORT);
>> + hid_hw_output_report(sc->hdev, buf, sizeof(buf));
>> }
>>
>> static void dualshock4_state_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>> @@ -1254,6 +1270,7 @@ static int sony_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
>> unsigned long quirks = id->driver_data;
>> struct sony_sc *sc;
>> unsigned int connect_mask = HID_CONNECT_DEFAULT;
>> + struct hid_ll_driver *ll_driver;
>>
>> sc = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, sizeof(*sc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (sc == NULL) {
>> @@ -1285,13 +1302,20 @@ static int sony_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
>> }
>>
>> if (sc->quirks & SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_USB) {
>> - hdev->hid_output_raw_report = sixaxis_usb_output_raw_report;
>> + ll_driver = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev, sizeof(*ll_driver),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (ll_driver == NULL)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + sc->prev_ll_driver = hdev->ll_driver;
>> + *ll_driver = *hdev->ll_driver;
>> + hdev->ll_driver = ll_driver;
>> + ll_driver->output_report = sixaxis_usb_output_report;
>> + ll_driver->raw_request = sixaxis_usb_raw_request;
>> ret = sixaxis_set_operational_usb(hdev);
>> INIT_WORK(&sc->state_worker, sixaxis_state_worker);
>> - }
>> - else if (sc->quirks & SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_BT)
>> + } else if (sc->quirks & SIXAXIS_CONTROLLER_BT) {
>> ret = sixaxis_set_operational_bt(hdev);
>> - else if (sc->quirks & DUALSHOCK4_CONTROLLER_USB) {
>> + } else if (sc->quirks & DUALSHOCK4_CONTROLLER_USB) {
>> /* Report 5 (31 bytes) is used to send data to the controller via USB */
>> ret = sony_set_output_report(sc, 0x05, 248);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> @@ -1339,6 +1363,8 @@ static int sony_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
>> err_close:
>> hid_hw_close(hdev);
>> err_stop:
>> + if (sc->prev_ll_driver)
>> + hdev->ll_driver = sc->prev_ll_driver;
>> if (sc->quirks & SONY_LED_SUPPORT)
>> sony_leds_remove(hdev);
>> if (sc->quirks & SONY_BATTERY_SUPPORT)
>> @@ -1351,6 +1377,9 @@ static void sony_remove(struct hid_device *hdev)
>> {
>> struct sony_sc *sc = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
>>
>> + if (sc->prev_ll_driver)
>> + hdev->ll_driver = sc->prev_ll_driver;
>> +
>> if (sc->quirks & SONY_LED_SUPPORT)
>> sony_leds_remove(hdev);
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists