[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52FCF4B1.5030208@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:37:05 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnurou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: firmware: add prepare_idle() operation
On 02/13/2014 04:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 07.02.2014 05:35, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Some firmwares do not put the CPU into idle mode themselves, but still
>> need to be informed that the CPU is about to enter idle mode before this
>> happens. Add a prepare_idle() operation to the firmware_ops structure to
>> handle such cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/firmware.h | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> I wonder if .do_idle() couldn't simply return an appropriate error code
> to let the upper layer know that it should proceed with normal CPU idle
> activation, while still letting the firmware know that the CPU is going
> to idle.
That seems to disagree with the naming of the operation, and the
semantics I assume it has, though. It seems clearer to add an explicit
separate op for this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists