[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7MeEEfqz-7RhCUjsoWPx_BKHVXFV3Y32xjf0B1WwjNdRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:32:45 -0800
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, Vitaly Lavrov <lve@...p.ru>
Subject: Re: ip_set: protocol %u message -- useful?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Jozsef Kadlecsik
<kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> messages in my dmesg. This might be because of some local
>> configuration changes I've made, or perhaps a kernel upgrade. Either
>> way, it appears this message has been a pr_notice since the original
>> code added it in a7b4f989a62 ("netfilter: ipset: IP set core
>> support").
>>
>> Does this message provide a lot of value? Or could it be made into a pr_debug?
>
> That's a report message on the protocol version used by the ipset
> subsystem. There was (and possibly will be) multiple protocols, so it
> helps to catch basic userpsace/kernelspace communication issues.
But still it doesn't deserve a pr_notice()... pr_info() should be enough.
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
index de770ec..5ea063f 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c
@@ -1945,7 +1945,7 @@ ip_set_net_init(struct net *net)
return -ENOMEM;
inst->is_deleted = 0;
rcu_assign_pointer(inst->ip_set_list, list);
- pr_notice("ip_set: protocol %u\n", IPSET_PROTOCOL);
+ pr_info("ip_set: protocol %u\n", IPSET_PROTOCOL);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists