[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140214.001004.838095636844604151.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:10:04 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: mst@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
qinchuanyu@...wei.com, joern@...fs.org, anatol.pomozov@...il.com,
nab@...ux-iscsi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] kref: add kref_sub_return
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:03:20 -0800
> So how about just "open coding" a kref for this structure, as it wants
> something that doesn't fit into the kref model, and should be pretty
> simple to do (you can ensure you get the locking right, unlike almost
> all users of krefs, as Al Viro constantly points out to me...)
They redid their patches meanwhile to use their own atomic_t.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists